Obama’s “elite” Science-Czar co-authored ECOSCIENCE, the 1,400 page textbook about how to secretly depopulate the masses. Since all “elites” appear interconnected if not interwoven/bred, is it conceivable that Data Centers are just Their latest scheme to milk, bilk, and profitably slow-kill the “non-elite” ilk?
Every major co-conspirator involved in the assassination of President Lincoln was Catholic or had substantive ties with the Roman Catholic Church / Vatican (then “Holy See”). Persons in/near the Lincoln assassination orbit with Catholic ties:
- Mary Surratt — Catholic; her boardinghouse was a conspirator meeting place; her tavern was
tied to Booth’s escape logistics. - John Surratt — Catholic; Booth conspirator in kidnapping plot; fled abroad; later served in
the Papal Zouaves. - Dr. Samuel A. Mudd — Catholic; treated Booth’s broken leg after the assassination.
- Thomas A. Jones — Catholic; hid/aided Booth and Herold during escape through southern
Jesuit-controlled lands along the Potomac River in Maryland. - David Herold — Catholic associations/schooling reported; possible Jesuit coadjutor.
- John Wilkes Booth — had close operational ties to Catholics/Surratt network; possible Jesuit coadjutor.
- Samuel Cox — aided Booth/Herold; religious identity unclear; possible Jesuit coadjutor.
- Pope Pius IX / Papal States authorities — Catholic/Papal connection through John Surratt’s
refuge/service/arrest/escape.
CT Wilcox later published a book documenting Jesuit foreknowledge of the assassination. Wilcox was run aground; his book made essentially impossible to locate. It reportedly contains primary documentation showing Jesuit foreknowledge of the assassination.
The Transformation of the Republic by Charles Wilcox
Publisher: Veracity Enterprises
Date: Dec. 27, 2005
Pages: 345
ISBN-10: 097395700X
ISBN-13: 9780973957006
OCLC: 62535596
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL11801161M/The_Transformation_of_the_Republic
Even US Presidents feared “the damnable” Jesuits
Specific Jesuit criticism is narrower than general anti-Catholic / anti-papal criticism. The
clearest primary-source examples:
John Adams, Founder and 2nd President, explicitly denounced the restored Jesuits / Society of Loyola in a letter to Thomas Jefferson dated May 5, 1816, available through Founders Online.
Thomas Jefferson, Founder and 3rd President, criticized the Jesuit restoration and priestly power in his 1816 correspondence with John Adams, especially in replies around the Jesuit restoration, also available through Founders Online.
John Adams also expressed anti-canon-law, anti-priestcraft, and anti-ecclesiastical tyranny views in A Dissertation on the Canon and Feudal Law from 1765.
John Jay, Founder and 1st Chief Justice, showed anti-papal-allegiance concerns in the New York constitutional debates and proposals of 1777, though the famous restriction was not specifically Jesuit-focused.
John Witherspoon, Founder, signer, and Presbyterian minister, expressed strong anti-Catholic and anti-Jesuit Protestant polemic in sermons and lectures, including Lectures on Moral Philosophy and anti-popery writings.
John Quincy Adams, 6th President, raised anti-papal and anti-Catholic political concerns in writings and speeches on Protestant liberty and Catholic political power, as well as in correspondence. Jesuits were sometimes treated in that context as agents of papal intrigue.
Strongest primary source
John Adams to Thomas Jefferson, May 5, 1816 is the big one. Adams wrote against the restored
Jesuits after Pope Pius VII revived the order in 1814. This is often quoted as Adams saying
the Jesuits deserved “eternal perdition” and warning they would appear in America under many
disguises.
Source to search directly:
Founders Online — “From John Adams to Thomas Jefferson, 5 May 1816”
https://founders.archives.gov/
Catholics / Jesuits / Vatican (the the “Holy See”) were widely, thoroughly feared and criticized by American ‘founding fathers’ and early US Presidents, some even in writing. Catholicism was illegal in Maryland. Escaping the profound zealotry and incredible wiles and intrigues of the Catholic church was a major factor in early American settlement, which was and remains predominantly Protestant.
Jesuits literally formed to “counter” Protestant Reformation
The Jesuits, the ‘militant-monk arm’ of the Roman Catholic Church, were literally formed to “counter” the Protestant Reformation and per their Fourth Vow (reportedly recorded in the US Congressional Record) seek to “extirpate” the existence of non-Catholic heretics.
- Open Library record
The Transformation of the Republic by Charles Wilcox
Publisher: Veracity Enterprises
Date: Dec. 27, 2005
Pages: 345
ISBN-10: 097395700X
ISBN-13: 9780973957006
OCLC: 62535596
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL11801161M/The_Transformation_of_the_Republic - WorldCat record
Title: The Transformation of the Republic: The Origins of the Religious Hi-jacking of the
American Government and the Truth Behind the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln
OCLC: 62535596
https://search.worldcat.org/title/62535596
Was Electrical Deregulation / DataCenters “anti-American”
Every major political player involved in dismantling the public utility status of electrical power / power-grid / energy generation and supply (PEPCO in Montgomery County, Maryland), splitting it asunder and opening its components to ‘market forces’, was in fact Catholic. Given the intense conspiratorial history, religious zealotry and endless intrigue targeting America: Is it conceivable that the incredible ‘push’ and ‘way-paving’ for DataCenters was in-fact another anti-American effort at its core?
So, again: Obama’s “elite” Science-Czar co-authored ECOSCIENCE, the 1,400 page textbook about how to secretly depopulate the masses. Since all “elites” appear interconnected if not interwoven/bred, is it conceivable that Data Centers are just Their latest scheme to milk, bilk, and profitably slow-kill the “non-elite” ilk?
Re-written in politically-correct verbiage —
Obama’s former science adviser, John P. Holdren, co-authored Ecoscience: Population,
Resources, Environment with Paul and Anne Ehrlich, a massive population-policy textbook that
has long drawn criticism for its discussion of coercive population-control measures. Given the
recurring pattern of elite institutional networks profiting from policies imposed on ordinary
people, it is fair to ask whether today’s massive data-center buildout is merely technological
progress—or another elite-backed scheme that externalizes costs onto the public while
concentrating profit, control, energy access, and political leverage.
A similar question arises when examining older American power struggles involving religion,
sovereignty, and institutional influence. The Lincoln assassination orbit included several
people with substantial Catholic or Papal-State connections:
- Mary Surratt — Catholic; her boardinghouse was a conspirator meeting place; her tavern was
tied to Booth’s escape logistics. - John Surratt — Catholic; involved in Booth’s earlier kidnapping conspiracy; fled abroad;
later served in the Papal Zouaves. - Dr. Samuel A. Mudd — Catholic; treated Booth’s broken leg after the assassination.
- Thomas A. Jones — Catholic; helped hide and move Booth and Herold through southern Maryland.
- David Herold — had reported Catholic schooling/associations; served as Booth’s key escape
accomplice. - John Wilkes Booth — not reliably shown to be Catholic, but operationally tied to the Surratt
network. - Samuel Cox — aided Booth and Herold; religious identity unclear.
- Pope Pius IX / Papal States authorities — relevant through John Surratt’s refuge, Papal
Zouave service, arrest, escape, and eventual capture. C.T. Wilcox later argued in The Transformation of the Republic that Jesuit or Papal
foreknowledge of Lincoln’s assassination could be documented. Whether his claims prove
institutional involvement remains disputed, but the book is real and cataloged: Charles Wilcox, The Transformation of the Republic
Publisher: Veracity Enterprises
Date: Dec. 27, 2005
Pages: 345
ISBN-10: 097395700X
ISBN-13: 9780973957006
OCLC: 62535596
Open Library: https://openlibrary.org/books/OL11801161M/The_Transformation_of_the_Republic
WorldCat: https://search.worldcat.org/title/62535596 American suspicion of Catholic political power and Jesuit influence was not fringe in early
U.S. history. Several founders and early presidents criticized “popery,” priestcraft,
ecclesiastical tyranny, or the Jesuits directly. The clearest primary-source example is John Adams’s letter to Thomas Jefferson, May 5, 1816,
after Pope Pius VII restored the Society of Jesus. Adams denounced the Jesuits sharply and
warned that they could reappear under many disguises.
Source: Founders Online — “From John Adams to Thomas Jefferson, 5 May 1816”
https://founders.archives.gov/ Other relevant figures include Thomas Jefferson, John Jay, John Witherspoon, and John Quincy
Adams, whose writings or political positions reflected broader Protestant republican anxiety
about papal allegiance, canon law, clerical power, and foreign ecclesiastical influence. This anti-Catholic and anti-Jesuit suspicion was part of the Anglo-American Protestant
inheritance. Early America was shaped by Reformation conflict, fears of Catholic monarchy,
fear of Jesuit intrigue, and resistance to religious authoritarianism. Maryland’s history was
especially complex: founded partly as a Catholic refuge, it later imposed serious Protestant
political restrictions against Catholics after Protestant control was established. The Jesuits themselves were founded in 1540 during the Counter-Reformation and became one of
Rome’s most disciplined instruments against Protestant expansion. Their special obedience to
the pope and reputation for political subtlety made them a persistent object of Protestant
suspicion. This background matters when considering later institutional captures. If earlier Americans
feared religious-political networks that could operate above or outside republican
accountability, then modern Americans may reasonably ask similar structural questions about
energy deregulation, data centers, and elite policy networks. In Maryland, the dismantling of traditional public-utility structures, the splitting of
generation/distribution/supply, and the exposure of essential power infrastructure to market
forces helped create conditions under which politically favored industries—now including data
centers—can consume vast public resources while ordinary ratepayers absorb the consequences. The core question is therefore not merely religious, technological, or economic. It is
institutional: │ Are data centers simply private infrastructure serving public progress, or are they another
│ elite-engineered mechanism for transferring energy, money, land, water, and political power
│ away from ordinary Americans and into the hands of protected networks? Given the long American history of suspicion toward unaccountable foreign, religious,
financial, and political power, that question deserves investigation rather than dismissal.
Electrical Gluttony. Water Consumption. Noise Pollution. Ground Vibration. Powerline Harmonics. Exploring the Web of Land-Grabby, Depopulative, Anti-Meat, Anti-Farm and Anti-Human Incessant Toxic Badness.
Sourced Series deeply explores the Many Serious Ill-Effects of Datacenters.
Every statement is sourced by scientific studies, published anecdotes, harmed victims.
Learn from others’ mistakes, or suffer similarly.
“A 2026 power-engineering study found that hyperscale data centers behave not merely as electrical loads, but as vast power-electronics systems whose rapidly fluctuating server demands can excite grid oscillations and propagate disturbances across interconnected networks. Far from a fringe “dirty electricity” claim, the research suggests data centers may interact with the power grid in ways fundamentally different from traditional industrial facilities, raising serious new concerns about resonance, stability, reliability.”
Erin Brockovich’s new data center map crashed twice in 72 hours.
The environmental advocate says she woke up one morning to dozens of messages from residents from one Louisiana community describing similar problems linked to data centers near their homes. When she began investigating, she struggled to get clear answers about the projects.
That prompted her to launch a public map where Americans could report operational, proposed, and under-construction data centers in their communities.
The response was immediate. Brockovich says the website crashed twice within its first 72 hours, revealing that the complaints were not limited to one town, one aquifer, or one project.
The map has since collected more than 8,000 community-reported locations.
Many residents say they learned about nearby developments only after construction had already begun. Their reports describe concerns about water consumption, electricity demand, constant mechanical noise, land use, electronic waste, and pressure on local infrastructure.
The controversy highlights a less visible side of the artificial intelligence boom. AI may feel entirely digital, but it relies on enormous physical facilities filled with servers that produce heat and operate around the clock.
Keeping those machines running requires electricity, cooling systems, transmission infrastructure, and, in some cases, large quantities of water. These demands can become especially contentious in communities already facing strained power grids or limited water supplies.
Data center developers argue that the facilities can bring construction investment, tax revenue, and new infrastructure. Brockovich’s project is focused on a different question: whether residents are being informed early enough to understand and influence what is being built around them.
Learn more:
“Erin Brockovich Explains Why She Started Mapping New Data Center Concerns.” Newsweek